PESTLE & MORTAR 6 June 2025

#1

China Rare Earth Ban Takes Effect

The escalating U.S.-China trade conflict centered on rare earth elements presents mounting risks for the global economy and geopolitical stability. In April 2025, China imposed sweeping export restrictions on critical rare earth materials and associated magnets, essential components in electric vehicles, semiconductors, military systems, and advanced electronics. These controls were a direct response to the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese imports. With China producing about 90% of the global supply of rare earths, its decision to slow-walk export license approvals has disrupted manufacturing across the U.S., Europe, India, and Japan. Carmakers like Ford and GM have already paused production, while European manufacturers warn of imminent factory shutdowns. The scramble for alternative sources has so far yielded limited success, exposing the world’s reliance on Chinese processing capabilities. Economically, the export controls are triggering inflationary pressures as companies resort to expensive workarounds, relocating production to China or redesigning components to avoid rare earth dependence. Investment uncertainty is rising, as manufacturers and suppliers face delays, higher costs, and regulatory risks. Geopolitically, China’s dominance in this supply chain has become a powerful lever. By weaponizing rare earth exports, Beijing is applying pressure on Washington and its allies, signaling a shift toward economic statecraft that will reshape global alignments. The trade war also demonstrates national security vulnerabilities, particularly for the U.S., which uses rare earths in everything from F-35 fighter jets to missile systems.

At the core of this standoff is a shift in Beijing’s strategy. Unlike during Trump’s first term, when China sought conciliation, President Xi has empowered a more hardline negotiating team under Vice Premier He Lifeng. The result is a bolder, state-centered economic posture that prioritizes leverage over compromise. Xi views the 2020 “Phase One” trade deal as a humiliation and seeks terms more favorable to China this time. As a result, the Geneva-brokered 90-day truce is rapidly unraveling, with both sides accusing the other of noncompliance. With auto and tech industries now caught in the crossfire and few alternative supply chains available in the near term, the economic fallout will likely deepen, forcing governments and corporations alike to reassess their dependencies, diversify their sourcing, and brace for prolonged strategic competition.

#2

Tariffs Threaten the Energy Sector

The Trump administration’s erratic tariff policies and frequent trade shifts have injected significant volatility into the global energy and manufacturing sectors. A recent federal court ruling blocked Trump from unilaterally applying tariffs under emergency powers, a decision the administration is now appealing. This legal uncertainty compounds existing global trade tensions and raises the stakes for industries reliant on stable supply chains. According to a report by Wood Mackenzie, three possible futures exist: a “trade truce,” where tariffs revert to 2024 levels and global GDP grows at 2.7% annually; a “trade tensions” scenario, in which moderate tariff increases slow growth; and a damaging “trade war” scenario, where tariffs remain above 30% and lead to a global recession. The middle scenario is seen as most likely. Energy and manufacturing sectors face acute exposure. While the oil and gas industry has historically aligned with the Trump administration, it would still suffer in a trade war due to falling commodity prices combined with rising costs for imported equipment. The renewable energy and battery storage industries are even more vulnerable, as they heavily depend on foreign-made components. For corporate leaders in energy, automotive, and heavy industry, the primary challenge is managing policy and supply chain uncertainty. Tariff volatility creates both regulatory risk and financial exposure. For renewable developers, the fragility of their international supply base and policy dependence demands urgent diversification and risk mitigation strategies. Investors and executives must also grapple with rising commodity volatility driven by climate events, geopolitical conflict, and fluctuating currency valuations.

#3

Global Economic Instability Increases

Recent economic assessments highlight growing global instability stemming from aggressive U.S. trade policies and rising sovereign debt levels among G7 nations. The OECD has downgraded its global growth forecast to 2.9% for both 2025 and 2026, citing the Trump administration’s escalating tariff regime, which has sharply curtailed U.S. investment and consumer spending. U.S. growth is projected to fall to just 1.6% in 2025, while the budget deficit is expected to reach 8% of GDP by 2026. Compounding the economic drag is a growing debt burden across the developed world. G7 nations, particularly the U.S., Japan, and the UK, are confronting bond market pressures due to investor anxiety over unchecked borrowing and spending, including record-high yields on long-term debt. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has warned that the U.S. debt trajectory could trigger significant bond market volatility, widening credit spreads and reducing access to capital for businesses. These developments indicate the fragility of the current economic landscape. The combination of aggressive trade policies and mounting debt levels in major economies like the U.S. and Japan is creating uncertainty in global markets. Investors are increasingly wary of the potential for inflation, reduced economic growth, and financial market volatility. Policymakers will likely need to reassess fiscal strategies and trade approaches to mitigate these risks and restore confidence in the global economy.

#4

Foreign Espionage and Ideological Insiders Increase Risks

In the Netherlands, officials warned that Chinese intelligence operations targeting advanced industries, including semiconductor manufacturing, are accelerating. Dutch Defense Minister Kajsa Ollongren emphasized that Chinese efforts go beyond traditional espionage, aiming to systematically undermine economic competitiveness and strategic autonomy. This aligns with broader European concerns over Beijing’s industrial theft and coercive technology transfer strategies, particularly in sectors like photonics, aerospace, and chip design, areas critical to global supply chains and military innovation. Simultaneously, the U.S. faces acute vulnerabilities from within. The case of 28-year-old DIA insider Ryan Laatsch, who allegedly attempted to pass classified intelligence to a foreign country, illustrates how internal political disillusionment, economic uncertainty, and foreign recruitment networks can converge to create serious counterintelligence threats. Alarmingly, Laatsch worked in the DIA’s Insider Threat Division itself, reinforcing concerns that even security personnel are not immune to radicalization or disaffection. His motivations appeared ideological, expressing skepticism about the U.S. political trajectory and explicitly seeking citizenship in a foreign country. These cases present three critical risks: (1) The growing sophistication and boldness of Chinese and Russian intelligence operations, which increasingly target not just defense secrets but commercial technologies in allied states; (2) the fragility of internal security in sensitive U.S. government agencies, where insider threats are compounded by political polarization and workplace discontent; and (3) the urgent need for organizations to reassess insider threat detection, workforce sentiment monitoring, and protective counterintelligence capabilities.

#5

Steel Tariffs Threaten Markets

On June 4, the U.S. implemented a 50% tariff on imported steel and aluminum, doubling the previous rate. This move follows President Trump’s accusation that China breached an agreement to reduce mutual trade barriers. The announcement caused a spike in U.S. prices for both metals, with aluminum premiums jumping 54% and hot rolled coil steel rising by 5%. Meanwhile, shares of U.S. steelmakers rose significantly, while foreign manufacturers, especially in Asia and Europe, saw declines. Germany's Salzgitter warned of severe repercussions for European industry, while South Korean companies like POSCO and Hyundai Steel experienced notable stock drops and convened emergency meetings. The U.S. remains the largest steel importer globally, with over 26 million tons imported in 2024. Despite skepticism over the tariffs’ longevity, U.S. aluminum producers welcomed the change as a protection against subsidized imports. Trade negotiations continue, with countries like South Korea and India seeking exemptions or reduced tariffs. Notably, Hyundai Steel has planned a $5.8 billion factory in Louisiana to mitigate future tariff impacts, though it won't be operational until 2029.

#6

Microsoft Supports AI Development in Switzerland

Microsoft has announced a $400 million investment in Switzerland to enhance its cloud computing and AI infrastructure. This initiative aims to expand and upgrade the company's four data centers near Geneva and Zurich, addressing the growing demand for AI and cloud services in the region. The expansion will ensure data residency within Swiss borders, a critical requirement for sectors like healthcare, finance, and government. Additionally, Microsoft plans to strengthen partnerships with small and medium-sized enterprises and increase training programs to help individuals effectively use AI and digital tools. Microsoft's investment shows the company's commitment to advancing AI capabilities and infrastructure. By enhancing data centers in Switzerland, Microsoft is positioning itself to better serve industries that require stringent data privacy and compliance standards. This move also reflects the broader trend of tech giants investing heavily in AI and cloud infrastructure to meet the escalating demand for AI-driven solutions across various sectors. Furthermore, the focus on training and collaboration with local enterprises indicates an effort to foster an ecosystem that supports AI innovation and adoption. By equipping individuals and businesses with the necessary tools and knowledge, Microsoft is facilitating the integration of AI technologies into everyday operations, potentially leading to increased efficiency and competitiveness.

#7

Law Firms Face Political Risks

The legal industry is facing turmoil as major law firms grapple with fallout from President Trump’s executive orders targeting firms seen as aligned with his political opponents. Some firms, such as Paul Weiss, Kirkland & Ellis, and Latham & Watkins, opted to strike deals with the administration—agreeing to provide pro bono services in exchange for relief from punitive measures like revoked security clearances and canceled client government contracts. Others, including Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, chose to challenge the orders in court, citing constitutional concerns. This division has sparked a backlash within the corporate world. At least eleven major companies, including Oracle, Morgan Stanley, Microsoft, and McDonald’s, are shifting business away from firms that made deals, questioning their ability to stand up for clients if they wouldn't stand up to political pressure. General counsels have expressed concerns over trust, independence, and potential conflicts of interest, especially when firms refuse to resist what many see as coercive and retaliatory executive action. Inside the law firms, the controversy has triggered partner departures, associate resignations, and internal rifts, particularly among younger lawyers who see the deals as capitulation to authoritarianism. Public protests have also targeted some of the deal-making firms. Meanwhile, firms that chose litigation have scored early court victories, with judges ruling that the executive orders amount to unconstitutional retaliation. This primarily shows the fraught political environment that even law firms find themselves in currently. Both capitulation to the administration and challenging the administration has created risks, and law firms having to overtly decided on political actions that previously they would not have.

#8

Swatting Part of Criminal Conspiracy

A 26-year-old Romanian national has pleaded guilty to orchestrating a sweeping swatting campaign that targeted senior U.S. government officials, including 25 members of Congress, cabinet members, federal judges, and law enforcement leaders. The Department of Justice described the campaign as one of the most extensive of its kind, involving bomb threats and false emergency reports intended to provoke armed police responses. The attacks were not random but part of a coordinated criminal conspiracy that also included threats against the U.S. Capitol. This marks a shift in swatting from isolated harassment to an organized tactic with national security implications. This case highlights a growing threat to corporate leaders, as high-profile private sector executives increasingly resemble government officials in terms of visibility, influence, and ideological targeting. The swatting campaign’s scale demonstrates that motivated actors can now target dozens of high-level individuals simultaneously. Corporate executives are logical next targets, particularly those involved in controversial industries, public policy advocacy, or high-profile litigation. What was once a juvenile prank has evolved into a coordinated tool for intimidation and disruption. Executives will now credibly face real-time physical threats, including armed law enforcement deployments to their homes or offices due to false reports. Many of these attacks rely on publicly available data, such as home addresses, family member names, or personal phone numbers. Executives who fail to reduce their digital footprint are increasingly vulnerable to doxxing-fueled harassment.

Looking for more in depth analysis? Sign up for The Strategic Memo. With your subscription, you'll receive weekly insights, special reports, and valuable resources aimed at improving your strategic thinking and decision-making.